Image Optimizer for XF 2.0

Image Optimizer for XF 2.0 [Paid] 2.2.1

PayPal: $29.00
View previous replies…
Code:
LogicException: Failed to optimize image in src/addons/Truonglv/ImageOptimizer/XF/Admin/Controller/Tools.php at line 215
Truonglv\ImageOptimizer\XF\Admin\Controller\Tools->actionIOTest() in src/XF/Mvc/Dispatcher.php at line 352
XF\Mvc\Dispatcher->dispatchClass() in src/XF/Mvc/Dispatcher.php at line 258
XF\Mvc\Dispatcher->dispatchFromMatch() in src/XF/Mvc/Dispatcher.php at line 115
XF\Mvc\Dispatcher->dispatchLoop() in src/XF/Mvc/Dispatcher.php at line 57
XF\Mvc\Dispatcher->run() in src/XF/App.php at line 2487
XF\App->run() in src/XF.php at line 524
XF::runApp() in admin.php at line 13
 
Do not attempt to run this addon on 2.3.0 until the author releases a version that is explicitly labelled as 2.3.0-compatible.
It can result in a significant number of optimized PNG images getting outright deleted from the filesystem, with the only fix being restoring the files from backup and disabling the addon.
 
Do not attempt to run this addon on 2.3.0 until the author releases a version that is explicitly labelled as 2.3.0-compatible.
I did, and I believe it resulted in a bug where a significant number of optimized PNG images got deleted from the filesystem. The only fix was disabling the addon and restoring files from backup.
WandererIt's one of the reasons I have not upgraded. The niche of my site webP is not that nice with the images.
It is also why I have not upgraded this add-on past the 2.1.7 version as there are known bugs with images going "poof" when latter versions are installed.
Not to mention the fact, until the developer clearly tells you that the add-on is 2.3 compatible, you should NEVER assume so. That is not an issue with the developer but with the website administrator.

I comment on the upgrade issue here.
 
View previous replies…
It's one of the reasons I have not upgraded. The niche of my site webP is not that nice with the images.
It is also why I have not upgraded this add-on past the 2.1.7 version as there are known bugs with images going "poof" when latter versions are installed.
Not to mention the fact, until the developer clearly tells you that the add-on is 2.3 compatible, you should NEVER assume so. That is not an issue with the developer but with the website administrator.

I comment on the upgrade issue here.
TD PerryDo you use latest version?
 
No, I use 2.1.7 on XF 2.2.16 as there were too many problems, even with the 2.2.0 update.
Even when I upgrade to XF 2.3 I really don't want to use webP as most people in the niche prefer to save in JPG format.
TD PerryWhat is problem with version 2.2.0?
 
What is problem with version 2.2.0?
TruonglvJust start reading from here forward
Seems a lot of people have been having issues and for use with 2.2 have settled on 2.1.7 since it was the last stable one.
Since the main part of my niche is images, I don't want to take a chance on losing them so let others find the issues.
 
This sites running in version 2.2.0 without any errors. If you can give steps to reproduce it, it would help to debug and fixing.
TruonglvAs I said, I don't want to take the chance of losing a lot of images, so I've stayed on 2.1.7. You may want to engage with some of the people having issues on the XF forum. MattW is one that runs a hosting service and apparently he and some of his clients have had issues.
 
As I said, I don't want to take the chance of losing a lot of images, so I've stayed on 2.1.7. You may want to engage with some of the people having issues on the XF forum. MattW is one that runs a hosting service and apparently he and some of his clients have had issues.
TD PerryOK. I will contact with him to investigate the issues
 
Back
Top