Watermark [Paid] 2.0.4

[weppa333]

Could you make it so to exclud some file extensions in the 1.0.4 branch ?
especially animated GIFs should be ignored, otherwise the plugin breaks them
this for xf 2.1

 

[Truonglv]

Could you make it so to exclud some file extensions in the 1.0.4 branch ?
especially animated GIFs should be ignored, otherwise the plugin breaks them
this for xf 2.1

weppa333what error you got in 2.1?

 

[weppa333]

what error you got in 2.1?

Truonglvwell i dont get an error, but using watermark 1.0.4 (which is the only one that works in XF2.1) all animated gif images are "watermarked" and replaced by a single frame, so they are destroyved
It would be nice if you could maybe release a 1.0.5 that would ignore all files with GIF extension (quick and easy fix)

 

[TD Perry]

well i dont get an error, but using watermark 1.0.4 (which is the only one that works in XF2.1) all animated gif images are "watermarked" and replaced by a single frame, so they are destroyved
It would be nice if you could maybe release a 1.0.5 that would ignore all files with GIF extension (quick and easy fix)

weppa333Has this been addressed? It really should not "touch" GIF file (ack spit) based upon the option of the user.

 

[TD Perry]

I'm going to "ass-u-me" that this actually allows users to choose whether or not they want the "default" watermark applied to uploaded images?
It's not really clear... and when based upon dropping $30 USD for an add-on that free add-ons do similar... it really needs something that "stand out" to drop that coin on it.. and honestly.. I haven't seen that yet.
Another issue... it REALLY should not change the original image.. I'm pretty sure the ability to "integrate" the watermark on XF display is present... as other add-ons have done that without changing the base image.

I have no issues with dropping the coin for an add-on that does (somewhat) what I need... currently, this add-on doesn't meet those requirements.