Involved templates:
The purpose of a Social group section is mainly, to keep all content within the navigation of a particular group wrapped by the group wrapper, so the user don´t gets confused or irritated. Utilizing the forums discussion option inside this addon, the breadcrumb navigation unfortunal is doing exactly the opposite.
While clicking the groups navtab discussions and inside the forums section of the group, the breadcrumb is
Visiting one of the created forums inside the group or a thread within one of the group forums, this is when the breadcrumb navigation is misleading the users. A user expects 2 things within the forums section of groups: an inner navigation, so he can easily and logicly navigate back and forth inside the group forums or - at least - a breadcrumb nav linking to the next parent node inside the group.
It even gets more problematic, when the webmaster has decided that he doesn´t want to have his well organized main forums index page spammed with hundreds of social groups forums and therefor disabled the display of the forums category hosting the social groups forums by disabling "Display in node list" in the XF category/forums settings. In that (very common) setting, the user gets even more irritated, since he now lands on the main index page of the forums - but with no group forums to display.
The same happens when a user is viewing a thread inside a group forum. The breadcrumb becomes
where
This is irritiating many users since they are afraid, that the forums would be open to the public and displayed to everyone - and as result, they are immediatly stopping to post anything and in general quit using the social groups addon. This is in fact a tiny error with a horrific impact in regards to this addon and should be adressed ASAP.
tlg_group_wrapper
, tlg_forum_view
, tlg_thread_view
The purpose of a Social group section is mainly, to keep all content within the navigation of a particular group wrapped by the group wrapper, so the user don´t gets confused or irritated. Utilizing the forums discussion option inside this addon, the breadcrumb navigation unfortunal is doing exactly the opposite.
While clicking the groups navtab discussions and inside the forums section of the group, the breadcrumb is
Testgruppe #1
is linking correctly to groups/testgruppe-1.1/discussions
.Visiting one of the created forums inside the group or a thread within one of the group forums, this is when the breadcrumb navigation is misleading the users. A user expects 2 things within the forums section of groups: an inner navigation, so he can easily and logicly navigate back and forth inside the group forums or - at least - a breadcrumb nav linking to the next parent node inside the group.
Gruppenforen
isn´t forwarding the user inside the group (!) to /groups/testgruppe-1.1/discussions
, but instead to /forums/#gruppenforen.3
- which is leading to the forums main index page and the user finds himself outside of the group.It even gets more problematic, when the webmaster has decided that he doesn´t want to have his well organized main forums index page spammed with hundreds of social groups forums and therefor disabled the display of the forums category hosting the social groups forums by disabling "Display in node list" in the XF category/forums settings. In that (very common) setting, the user gets even more irritated, since he now lands on the main index page of the forums - but with no group forums to display.
The same happens when a user is viewing a thread inside a group forum. The breadcrumb becomes
where
Gruppenforen
is leading again to the forums main index page instead of /groups/testgruppe-1.1/discussions
while Gruppentestforum #1
leads correctly to the index page of that group forum inside the group.This is irritiating many users since they are afraid, that the forums would be open to the public and displayed to everyone - and as result, they are immediatly stopping to post anything and in general quit using the social groups addon. This is in fact a tiny error with a horrific impact in regards to this addon and should be adressed ASAP.
Last edited: